Unitron Moxi Kiss
 

Stimulus Levels for Pediatric REM

Susan Scollie, PhD

July 13, 2009


Question

What stimulus levels should be used to verify average conversational speech when performing real ear measurements in children?

Answer

Verifying hearing aid performance for average conversational speech is usually aimed at measuring the frequency shaping of the fitting for use during conversations in quiet. One such situation has been well-described in the literature: a talker uses a normal vocal effort and is directly in front of the listener, with about 1 meter spacing between talker and listener (Byrne et al, 1994, Cox & Moore, 1988, Olsen, 1998). In this situation, most people produce speech that is about 60 dB SPL, overall. If the talker is closer, or if the talker uses a raised vocal effort, higher overall levels in the range of 65 are also realistic (Olsen, 1998). An input level of 70 dB SPL, however, is closer to a "loud" vocal effort, and is likely higher than what truly reflects "average conversation". In practice, it is often useful to perform verification measures using levels that help us verify WDRC hearing aids. This suggests two things. First, it helps to verify the frequency shaping of the fitting above the WDRC compression threshold (CT), so that the shape is not changed by the hearing aid moving into and out of compression across channels. Second, it is often a good idea to verify across input levels to quantify output and audibility for a range of speech levels. A 65 dB SPL "average" speech estimate is high enough that it exceeds the WDRC CT in most cases, and not so high that it represents loud speech. However, today's generation of prescriptive targets will vary the target with the chosen verification test level, so you can feel free to choose the input level that is most helpful for each child. If you have a low WDRC CT and wish to know about "normal conversation", you can use a test level of 60 dB SPL. If you have a higher WDRC CT and wish to make sure you are above CT, you can use a test level of 70 dB SPL. Putting all of this together, we typically use 55 (soft), 65 (average), and 75 (loud) dB SPL inputs. These general concepts apply to both adults and children, at least for face to face communication. Other listening situations (such as the classroom) may require different approaches.

References

Byrne D, Dillon H, Tran K, Arlinger S, Wilbraham K, Cox R, et al. (1994). An international comparison of long-term average speech spectra. J Acoust Soc Am 96: 2108-2120.

Cox RM and Moore JN. (1988). Composite speech spectrum for hearing aid gain prescriptions. J Speech Hear Res 31: 102-107.

Olsen WA. (1998). Average speech levels and spectra in various speaking/listening conditions: A summary of the Pearson, Bennett, and Fidell (1977) report. Am J Audiol 7: 1-5.

Dr. Susan Scollie is an Assistant Professor of Audiology at the University of Western Ontario. Together with colleagues at Canada's National Centre for Audiology, she has contributed to version 5.0 of the DSL Method, and finds speech-based real ear measurement to be really useful during hearing aid fitting and troubleshooting.


susan scollie

Susan Scollie, PhD

Assistant Professor in the School of Communication Sciences and Disorders

Susan Scollie, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor in the School of Communication Sciences and Disorders. Together with Dr. Richard Seewald, she co-directs the Siemens Child Amplification laboratory at Canada’s National Centre for Audiology. Dr. Scollie has served on committees to develop Preferred Practice Guidelines for the prescription of hearing aids in both adults and children for the College of Audiologists and Speech-Language Pathologists of Ontario, and is a consultant for the Ontario Infant Hearing Program. She has completed efficacy studies of digital and directional hearing aids, evaluated the accuracy of probe microphone measurements, and provided technical support for the DSL[i/o] prescriptive algorithm to clinicians and industry. More recently, she and her colleagues have developed version 5.0 of the DSL Method for hearing aid fitting.


Related Courses

Presenter

Presenter: susan scollie

Susan Scollie, PhD

Hearing Aid Technologies, Hearing Aid Testing, and Kids: Bringing it all Together [Live Webinar Course]

Course: #22291
Wednesday, May 29, 2013 at 12:00 pm EDT
CEUs/Hours Offered: AAA/0.1 Intermediate; ACAud/1.0; ASHA/0.1 Intermediate, Professional; BAA/1.0; CAA/1.0; CASLPA/1.0; IHS/1.0; Kansas DHE, LTS-S0035/1.0
Cost: Free to View

This course will cover how we can test new hearing aid technologies to check their function for children with hearing loss. Tests covered will include electroacoustic tests and aided speech tests that young children can complete.

Presenters

Presenter: susan scollie

Susan Scollie, PhD

Marlene Bagatto, AuD, PhD

Fitting Hearing Aids to Babies: Three Things You Should Know - 2010 Update [Text/Transcript Course]

Course: #17201
CEUs/Hours Offered: AAA/0.1 Intermediate; ACAud/0.1; ASHA/0.1 Intermediate, Professional; BAA/1.0; CAA/1.0; CASLPA/1.0; IHS/1.0; IL EITP/1.0; Kansas DHE, LTS-S0035/1.0
Cost: Free to View

Responsible infant hearing aid fitting needs to ensure that babies are neither over-amplified nor under-amplified, and that the hearing aids will provide comfortable yet beneficial levels of sound. What special factors might present barriers to accurate hearing aid fitting for babies in EHDI programs? In our program, we think that special attention needs to be paid to three infant-specific areas: (1) We use electrophysiology to estimate hearing rather than behavioral audiometry during the earliest parts of early intervention; (2) Babies' ear canals are small and growing, presenting ongoing challenges for fitting and re-fitting; and (3) The accuracy of infant hearing aid fitting can be enhanced by routine verification of every fitting. This article will discuss each of these areas and illustrate why they matter, using case examples.

Presenter

Presenter: susan scollie

Susan Scollie, PhD

20Q: The Ins and Outs of Frequency Lowering Amplification [Text/Transcript Course]

Course: #22539
CEUs/Hours Offered: AAA/0.1 Intermediate; ACAud/1.0; AHIP/1.0; BAA/1.0; CAA/1.0; CASLPA/1.0; Calif. HADB/1.0 Hearing Aid Related; IHS/1.0; Kansas DHE, LTS-S0035/1.0
Cost: Free to View

This article discusses considerations for fitting, fine tuning and verifying frequency lowering technology, in an engaging question and answer format.

Presenters

Presenter: marlene bagatto

Marlene Bagatto, AuD, PhD

Susan Scollie, PhD

Danielle Glista, MSc

Vijay Parsa, PhD

Richard Seewald, PhD

Case Study Outcomes of Hearing Impaired Listeners Using Nonlinear Frequency Compression Technology [Text/Transcript Course]

Course: #10768
CEUs/Hours Offered: AAA/0.1 Intermediate; ACAud/1.0; AHIP/1.0; BAA/1.0; CAA/1.0; CASLPA/1.0; Calif. HADB/1.0 Hearing Aid Related; IHS/1.0; Kansas DHE, LTS-S0035/1.0
Cost: Free to View

Providing audibility of a wide range of input levels from a broad frequency spectrum is a goal of any hearing aid fitting. For listeners with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss, this goal can be challenging to meet with amplitude compression technology for several reasons. Various signal processing strategies, such as frequency compression, have emerged to allow high-frequency information to be moved to a lower-frequency region so it can be more easily accessed by the listener. Case studies utilizing a prototype hearing aid employing multichannel nonlinear frequency compression (NFC) technology will be discussed to illustrate the effects of this technology.

Presenters

Presenter: danielle glista

Danielle Glista, MSc

Susan Scollie, PhD

Modified Verification Approaches for Frequency Lowering Devices [Text/Transcript Course]

Course: #14811
CEUs/Hours Offered: AAA/0.1 Advanced; ACAud/0.1; AHIP/1.0; BAA/1.0; CAA/1.0; Calif. HADB/1.0 Hearing Aid Related; IHS/1.0; Kansas DHE, LTS-S0035/1.0
Cost: Free to View

Frequency lowering hearing aids have the ability to bring high-frequency sounds down to regions of greater audibility for listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. Due to the nature of the advanced signal processing in such devices, conventional approaches to electroacoustic verification may require some modification. This article describes current techniques and tools available when verifying frequency lowering devices.