| | 
America's Audiology Network
Hear Now. And Always
Leader in the Hearing Assessment Market
The Science of Sound
Assistive Listening Devices and System
Recapturing the Everyday Moments with Breakthrough Tinnitus Treatment
Audiological Equipment
Hearing Aid Insurance For Everyone
People First
Hearing Instrument Manufacturer's Software Association
Hearing Systems
Premium technology. Costco value.
Hearing Aid Batteries
Solutions for better hearing
Life sounds brilliant.
Everyday Sounds Better
Hearing Systems
Custom Web Solutions
Experience More.
#1 Practice Management Software
Connect with possibilities
Freedom of Choice
The Cochlear Implant Technology Innovation Leader
America's Most Trusted Name in Hearing Care.
Helping the World Hear Better
To help you hear, we start by listening.
Leaders In Audiology & Hearing Clinic Management Software
|
|
| Home | What's New | Ask the Expert | Details |
 
|
| |
Constructing a Hearing Aid Fitting Using the Latest Clinical Evidence
Interview with Jan Metzdorff, President, and Don Hayes, Ph.D., Director of Audiology, Unitron
Be Your Own Boss: 5 Tips for Successfully Buying an Audiology Practice
Interview with Mona Dworsack-Dodge, Wendy Crumley-Welsh, Jill Craig and Wendy Switalski, Otometrics
Interview with Ravi Sockalingam, Ph.D., Oticon Medical
20Q: Any Color, So Long As It’s Black - Individualizing Clinical Audiology Practice
Interview with Tom Harris, Ridge Sampson & Sean Shoffstall, Sycle.net
Interview with Casie Keaton, Au.D., CCC-A – Clinical Sales Manager, Neuromonics
Interview with Tracey Kruger, Vice President of Marketing, Advanced Bionics, LLC
Interview with Lise Lotte Bundesen, Managing Director, Ida Institute
Sonic’s Speech Understanding in Noise
Evidence for Tinnitus Treatments
Billing Codes for Hearing Protection Devices
Monthly Review “Tinnitus Miracle Cure – Act Now!”
Siemens Hearing Instruments USA Launches Facebook Page to Celebrate Better Hearing and Speech Month
HLAA Introduces Spokesperson and National Walk4Hearing Business Chair
Tinnitus Awareness Week Ups Understanding of Condition Affecting 50 Million Americans
ReSound Donates Hearing Aids to Oxygen Docu-Series
» More What's New |
|
5/15/2006
Carol Flexer, Ph.D., Cert. AVT
I am an education-based SLP in Ontario, Canada, who plays a significant support role in assisting with the paperwork, installation, in-service, and troubleshooting of Audiologist-recommended FM systems for several students (CAP) in our system. We have no on-site educational Audiologist. In order to qualify for provincial government funding assistance, school Boards must complete a 6 month trial period of use in order to prove the student benefits from the provision of an FM system. My question/concern is regarding this required timeline. We feel that trial use for a period of approximately 6 to 8 weeks is sufficient. What is your expert opinion?
This is an excellent question that can prompt a great deal of discussion. I think that the first issue, or maybe question, is what outcome/results are we expecting the FM to provide? There are potentially both short and long term results. Short term results could include better auditory focus, increased attention span, longer time on task, and fewer disruptive behaviors. Of course, measuring these results can be tricky and may involve videotaping, or at the least, multiple pre-FM use and post-FM classroom observations. In addition, the child in question may have spent many years “practicing” his diffuse focus and disruptive behaviors, so these unwanted behaviors may not disappear over night. Long term results are based on learning and practicing new skills and strategies. New skills could take many months or years to show up as improved learning and performance because we are growing new neural connections in the brain and creating new “data files” of life and language experience. Measurement of new skills could include improved grades, accurate class participation, and higher marks on standardized tests. In addition, tools such as the SIFTER, LIFE and CHILD could be useful.
The second issue concerns expectations. Are we expecting the equipment to solve all of the student’s problems….to be the magic bullet? Or, have we targeted a few, critical behaviors that we are expecting the equipment to address. That is, extensive research has demonstrated that signal-to-noise ratio enhancing technology is necessary to create a viable classroom learning environment for students. However, that technology may not be sufficient to address all of the challenges experienced by a child with APD; additional accommodations and therapies may also be required.
So, I guess the answer is complicated because the issues are complicated. I suggest first identifying short and long term desired outcomes of FM use and the tools needed to measure those outcomes. Next, one ought to identify if the equipment is expected to occur with additional accommodations, or instead of any additional accommodations or therapies. What is realistic?
Of course, my opinion is that every classroom ought to have a well-installed and used sound field system as a necessary learning condition for all children. Studies have shown that the universal use of sound field technology reduces the need for special education referrals; the technology nips many potential problems in the bud before they have a chance to blossom, including APD problems.
Thank you for your question, and best of luck with whatever you decide to do.
Carol Flexer, Ph.D., Cert. AVT
Dr. Flexer is a Distinguished Professor of Audiology at The University of Akron. Her areas of expertise include pediatric and educational Audiology. She has over 140 publications in that area and has been at the University for about 27 years.
|
|
AuDNet
Cochlear
Bio-Logic
ReSound
Comfort Audio
Neuromonics
Otometrics
ESCO
Oticon
HIMSA
Phonak
Costco Hearing Aid Centers
Rayovac
audifon
Siemens
Sonic
SeboTek
AudiologyDesign
Starkey
Sycle.net
Unitron
Oticon Medical
Advanced Bionics
Hear USA
Beltone
Amplifon
Simply Hearing Software
