Understanding Central Auditory Processing Disorder and Treatment Recommendations

This text-based format is a transcript of a live webinar that was created by Continued and edited with AI assistance.

Introduction

Central Auditory Processing Disorder (CAPD), also known as Auditory Processing Disorder (APD), represents a complex and often misunderstood condition characterized by deficits in the neural processing of auditory information. Unlike peripheral hearing loss, which involves issues with the outer, middle, or inner ear, CAPD primarily affects how the brain interprets sounds, even when an individual possesses normal or near-normal hearing acuity. This article, drawing upon a comprehensive webinar presented by Janette Mongelli, Au.D., CCC-A, a distinguished member of Starkey's Regional Education and Training Team, aims to provide an in-depth understanding of CAPD, its diagnostic criteria, and recommended treatment strategies. The insights presented herein are evidence-based, reflecting the most current scientific understanding and clinical expertise in the field.

Learner Objectives

After this course, participants will be able to:

• Define central auditory processing disorder.
• List the deficits associated with central auditory processing disorder.
• Describe recommended treatments for patients with central auditory processing disorder.

History of CAPD

The journey to understanding Central Auditory Processing Disorder is a story of evolving scientific inquiry and clinical observation. Research into what we now recognize as CAPD began as early as 1954, with pioneering work by researchers such as Bocca and colleagues, and later by Sperry and Gazzaniga. These early investigations primarily focused on neurological patients who, despite exhibiting normal peripheral hearing, reported significant difficulties in understanding auditory stimuli. This initial observation laid the groundwork for differentiating CAPD from conventional hearing loss.

The 1980s marked a pivotal period with the emergence of research into hemispheric specialization. Scientists began to explore which specific functions were predominantly handled by the right versus the left cerebral hemisphere. A significant portion of this research involved studying "split-brain patients"—individuals who had undergone surgical severing of the corpus callosum. The corpus callosum is a dense tract of neuronal fibers that serves as the primary conduit for interhemispheric transfer, connecting the right and left hemispheres of the brain. This radical surgical procedure was typically performed on patients suffering from intractable epilepsy, where seizure activity originating in one hemisphere would spread uncontrollably to the other. Researchers observed that while most individuals who underwent this surgery functioned largely normally, specific and subtle deficits in processing information, including auditory information, became apparent. This research provided crucial insights into the lateralization of brain functions, contributing to the popular, albeit simplified, understanding of "right-brained" versus "left-brained" characteristics, with the left hemisphere often associated with language and analytical skills, and the right with artistic and pattern recognition abilities.

The 1990s saw the development of early screening measures for CAPD. Notable among these were the Buffalo Model and the Children's Auditory Performance Scale (CHAPS) questionnaire. During this decade, auditory integration training also gained popularity, though subsequent research later demonstrated its lack of reliable evidence, highlighting the importance of evidence-based practice in audiology.

The 2000s were characterized by the foundational work of Bellis and Chermak, who were instrumental in establishing key dichotic and temporal battery tests. These tests became, and largely remain, widely used in the clinical diagnosis of CAPD. Their contributions provided a more standardized and robust approach to assessing central auditory function.

From the 2010s to the present day, the field has continued to advance through systematic reviews of existing literature. These reviews have focused on assessing diagnostic variance—examining the different criteria and approaches used to diagnose CAPD—and evaluating the efficacy of various interventions. This ongoing scrutiny ensures that diagnostic and treatment protocols for CAPD are continually refined and supported by the best available evidence. More recently, there has been a growing recognition of CAPD in the context of aging. While a distinct and extensive topic in itself, the observation that older adults, even those with age-related hearing loss, often exhibit similar auditory processing deficits to those seen in CAPD, underscores the broad relevance of this disorder across the lifespan. This evolving understanding prompts a reevaluation of how auditory processing challenges are addressed in the elderly population, potentially leading to new diagnostic and rehabilitative strategies tailored to this demographic.

Central Auditory Processing Disorder (CAPD)

Understanding Central Auditory Processing Disorder necessitates a clear and comprehensive definition. The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) defines CAPD as "deficits in the neural processing of auditory information in the CANS (not due to higher order language or cognitive factors) demonstrated by poor performance in one or more of the following skills: Sound localization and lateralization, Auditory discrimination, Auditory pattern recognition, Temporal aspects of audition, Auditory performance in competing acoustic signals, and Auditory performance with degraded acoustic signals." This definition emphasizes that CAPD is distinct from issues related to language comprehension or cognitive abilities.

The American Academy of Audiology (AAA) further elaborates on the possible features of CAPD, outlining several key characteristics. These include a poor perception of both speech and non-speech sounds, indicating a fundamental difficulty in interpreting acoustic information. The origins of CAPD are rooted in impaired neural function within the central auditory nervous system. Critically, CAPD impacts everyday life by reducing an individual's ability to listen effectively and respond appropriately in various auditory environments. It is important to note that these difficulties do not stem from a failure to understand instructions, but rather from a breakdown in the processing of the auditory input itself. A significant aspect of CAPD is its frequent co-occurrence with other neurodevelopmental disorders, which can complicate diagnosis and intervention. Both ASHA and AAA definitions underscore a crucial point: individuals with CAPD struggle with these auditory processing tasks despite having normal or near-normal peripheral hearing, distinguishing it from a typical hearing loss that would be detectable on an audiogram. This often leads to it being considered a "subclinical" hearing loss, where the auditory system's peripheral components function adequately, but the central processing mechanisms falter.

Central Auditory Nervous System (CANS) Anatomy

A foundational understanding of the Central Auditory Nervous System (CANS) anatomy is essential for comprehending CAPD, as the disorder involves deficits in the neural processing within this system. It is important to distinguish the CANS from the peripheral auditory system, which includes the outer, middle, and inner ear. The CANS begins with the cochlear nerve, also known as cranial nerve VIII, which transmits auditory information from the cochlea to the brainstem.

From the cochlear nerve, auditory signals proceed to the cochlear nucleus, located in the superior medulla. This is the first relay station in the brainstem for auditory information. From the cochlear nucleus, the signals project to the superior olivary complex. The superior olivary complex is a critical structure in the auditory pathway because it is where the majority of nerve fibers cross contralaterally, meaning they cross over to the opposite side of the brain. This decussation is particularly significant in CAPD, as much of the diagnostic testing for the disorder focuses on identifying contralateral deficits, which can reveal issues in this crucial crossing pathway.

Following the superior olivary complex, auditory information ascends to the inferior colliculus, a midbrain structure involved in auditory reflexes and sound localization. From there, signals are relayed to the medial geniculate body in the thalamus, which acts as a major relay station for auditory information before it is finally projected to the auditory cortex. The auditory cortex, located primarily in the temporal lobe, is responsible for the conscious perception and interpretation of sound.

While not explicitly detailed in some anatomical diagrams, the corpus callosum plays a vital role in central auditory processing. As previously mentioned, this dense tract of nerve fibers connects the two cerebral hemispheres, facilitating interhemispheric transfer of auditory information. Its integrity is crucial for tasks requiring the integration of auditory input from both ears, and its delayed myelination or damage can significantly impact auditory processing, particularly in cases of developmental CAPD. Understanding this intricate pathway allows clinicians to pinpoint potential areas of breakdown in the CANS that contribute to the diverse manifestations of CAPD.

Prevalence and Etiology of CAPD

The prevalence and etiology of Central Auditory Processing Disorder vary across different age groups and depend on a range of factors, including neurological conditions and developmental processes.

Prevalence of CAPD

In the United States, the National Institutes for Health (NIH) estimates that CAPD affects approximately 3 to 5% of children. Among children referred for audiologic evaluation, roughly 5% receive a CAPD diagnosis. A notable statistic highlights the comorbidity of CAPD: among children already diagnosed with learning disabilities, the prevalence of CAPD is estimated to be as high as 43%. This significant overlap underscores the complex interplay between auditory processing deficits and other developmental challenges. It is important to acknowledge that precisely calculating the incidence and prevalence of CAPD remains challenging due to the lack of fully standardized diagnostic criteria and variations in guidance from different academic organizations.

For adults, the NIH estimates that 0.5 to 1% of individuals with normal hearing have CAPD. When considering adults referred for audiology evaluations due to concerns despite normal hearing, approximately 0.9% are identified with CAPD. Overall, the largest demographic group presenting with CAPD comprises children with normal hearing. While the focus of this discussion is primarily on younger populations, it is also recognized that older adults may exhibit similar auditory processing difficulties, often linked to age-related degeneration of the central auditory nervous system, a topic that warrants further dedicated exploration.

Etiology of CAPD

The etiology of CAPD can be broadly categorized into neurological conditions, which can be congenital or acquired, and delayed central nervous system (CNS) maturation or developmental disorders.

Neurological Conditions: Congenital or Acquired

A variety of acquired neurological conditions can lead to CAPD. These include:

• Lesions or tumors of the CANS: Any structural abnormalities or growths within the central auditory nervous system can disrupt the neural pathways responsible for processing auditory information.
• Neurodegenerative disorders: Conditions such as multiple sclerosis (MS) can cause demyelination of neurons throughout the body, including those in the auditory pathways. This damage impairs the efficient transmission of nerve impulses, leading to auditory processing deficits.
• Cerebrovascular disease: This category encompasses conditions like strokes, aneurysms, and vascular malformations. For instance, a stroke affecting the left middle cerebral artery, a common site for cerebrovascular events, can result in damage to the left temporal lobe, where the auditory cortex and language centers are located. Such damage can precipitate CAPD in adults with otherwise normal hearing.
• Traumatic brain injury (TBI): TBI, particularly prevalent among service members, can lead to CAPD even in individuals with intact peripheral hearing. The trauma can disrupt neural connections and processing capabilities within the CANS.
• Prenatal/neonatal risk factors: Certain adverse events during prenatal development or the neonatal period can predispose an individual to CAPD.
• Degeneration of CANS (age-related): As individuals age, the central auditory nervous system can undergo degenerative changes, contributing to auditory processing difficulties that share characteristics with CAPD.

Delayed CNS Maturation and/or Developmental Disorders

This category is particularly relevant in pediatric CAPD. While the human auditory system is fully developed at birth, the myelination of higher auditory pathways, including the crucial corpus callosum, continues until approximately 12 years of age, and potentially even later. Myelination is the process by which nerve fibers acquire a myelin sheath, which insulates them and speeds up the transmission of electrical signals.

Because the corpus callosum is a major pathway for interhemispheric transfer of auditory information, any condition that restricts auditory input during this critical developmental period can disproportionately affect the maturation of these pathways. For example, chronic ear infections that lead to fluctuating conductive hearing loss can impede the consistent and clear auditory input necessary for the proper development of central auditory processing skills. Children experiencing such conditions may exhibit more pronounced central auditory processing effects due to this delayed maturation.

The concept of the "right ear advantage" is often discussed in the context of CANS maturation. This phenomenon occurs because the majority of neuronal fibers from the right ear project directly to the left hemisphere, which is dominant for language processing. Conversely, input from the left ear primarily goes to the right hemisphere and then must cross over to the left hemisphere via the corpus callosum. In cases of delayed corpus callosum maturation or dysfunction, deficits in processing information presented to the left ear are often observed, as the interhemispheric transfer pathway is compromised.

Comorbidity of CAPD

The diagnosis and management of Central Auditory Processing Disorder are frequently complicated by its comorbidity with other neurodevelopmental and learning disorders. CAPD often shares features with, and can co-occur alongside, a range of conditions, making it challenging for clinicians to differentiate primary auditory processing deficits from symptoms arising from other disorders.

Common conditions that may share features with or co-occur with CAPD include:

• Autism: Individuals on the autism spectrum may exhibit difficulties with auditory processing, including challenges with understanding speech in noise, interpreting tone of voice, and integrating auditory information, which can overlap with CAPD symptoms.
• Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): A significant overlap exists between CAPD and ADHD. Approximately 50% of children diagnosed with ADHD also present with CAPD. Both conditions can manifest as difficulties with attention, distractibility, following instructions, and academic performance, making differential diagnosis crucial. While ADHD affects attention broadly, CAPD specifically impacts how auditory information is processed, which can then lead to attentional difficulties in auditory tasks.
• Learning Disabilities (including dyslexia): CAPD is highly comorbid with learning disabilities. For instance, about 70% of children with dyslexia, a specific learning disability affecting reading, also have CAPD. Auditory processing skills, such as phonological awareness and temporal processing, are fundamental to reading and spelling, so deficits in these areas can directly contribute to or exacerbate learning difficulties.
• Language Delays and/or Disorders: Difficulties in auditory processing can directly impact language development and comprehension. Children with CAPD may struggle with understanding complex sentences, following rapid speech, or discriminating between similar-sounding words, all of which are critical for language acquisition and use.
• Sensory Processing Disorder: This broader disorder involves difficulties in processing sensory information from various modalities, including auditory. Overlaps with CAPD can occur when the auditory system's ability to organize and interpret sound input is impaired.

The significant comorbidity means that a comprehensive evaluation is essential to tease apart the primary nature of an individual's difficulties. A thorough diagnostic process helps clinicians determine whether auditory processing deficits are a primary issue, a contributing factor to another disorder, or a manifestation of a broader neurodevelopmental challenge. This differentiation is critical for developing targeted and effective intervention strategies that address the specific needs of the patient.

Evaluation of CAPD

The evaluation of Central Auditory Processing Disorder is a multifaceted process that requires a comprehensive approach to accurately diagnose the condition and differentiate it from other co-occurring disorders. The evaluation typically involves four key components: a comprehensive case history, the use of observational tools, adherence to specific diagnostic criteria, and a thorough diagnostic evaluation using a battery of tests.

Comprehensive Case History

A thoughtful and thorough case history is the cornerstone of any CAPD evaluation, particularly for younger children. This detailed inquiry gathers crucial information that can shed light on potential etiologies, contributing factors, and the nature of the auditory difficulties. Key areas of inquiry include:

• Patient's personal and family medical history: This includes any known or potential genetic abnormalities that might predispose an individual to auditory processing issues.
• Prenatal, perinatal, postnatal history and development: Information regarding pregnancy, childbirth, and developmental milestones following birth can identify early risk factors.
• General health status: Significant medical conditions or psychological factors can influence auditory processing and overall functioning.
• Communication, listening, and auditory skills and behaviors: Detailed descriptions of how the individual listens, communicates, and behaves in various auditory environments are critical.
• Social development, linguistic and cultural background: Cultural norms and linguistic exposure can influence how auditory skills are developed and expressed, necessitating a culturally competent approach to evaluation.
• Any prior therapies and/or current treatments: Understanding previous interventions and their outcomes can inform current diagnostic and treatment planning.
• Any etiological basis for auditory deficits: This includes a history of trauma, traumatic brain injury (TBI), lesions, degenerative disorders, or metabolic dysfunction that could impact the CANS.
• Behavioral characteristics: Observing and documenting behaviors commonly associated with CAPD provides valuable qualitative data.

It is often challenging to test children younger than 7 years old, as most standardized tests in the CAPD battery have norms only for children aged 7 and older. This age limitation is also due to the difficulty in teasing apart CAPD from other learning disabilities or neurodevelopmental disorders in very young children.

Common Behavioral Reports/Symptoms

Patients with CAPD often present with a consistent set of behavioral reports and symptoms that indicate difficulties in processing auditory information. These can include:

• Difficulty understanding speech in noise, a very common and often debilitating symptom.
• Problems localizing sound sources.
• Difficulty hearing on the phone.
• Inconsistent responses to requests for information.
• Difficulty following rapid speech.
• Frequent requests for repetition and/or rephrasing.
• Difficulty following directions.
• Difficulty or inability to detect tone of voice.
• Difficulty learning a foreign language.
• Difficulty maintaining attention.
• A tendency to be easily distracted.
• Poor singing or musical ability.
• Academic difficulties, including reading, spelling, and/or learning problems.

Observational Tools

Observational tools, typically in the form of checklists or questionnaires, are valuable for gathering information about an individual's listening behaviors in real-world settings, especially in the pediatric population. These tools often help differentiate auditory processing difficulties from attentional or language issues.

• Auditory Processing Domains Questionnaire (APDQ): A common tool for parents of children aged 7 to 17 years. It features four subscales—adjusted auditory processing, attention control, language, and target auditory processing—designed to differentiate auditory processing from attention and language deficits.
• Checklist of Auditory Perceptual Subskills: Suggested by AAA as a screening tool, this is designed for teachers and parents of infants and young toddlers.
• Children's Auditory Performance Scale (CHAPS): Used by parents and teachers for children aged 7 years and older, this rates children's listening behavior in various conditions (noise, quiet, ideal, multiple inputs) and assesses auditory memory, sequencing, and attention span.
• Children's Home Inventory of Listening Difficulties (CHILD): A family-centered tool completed by the child with parent/audiologist help, and by a family member, to rate the child's ability to hear in various home environments. It can be used pre-test and post-treatment.
• Listening Inventory for Education-Revised Student Appraisal of Listening Difficulty (LIFE-R SALD): A self-rating tool for students to assess their perceived difficulty in classroom listening environments. A teacher version is also available.

Diagnostic Criteria

Both ASHA and AAA provide specific diagnostic criteria for CAPD, which guide clinicians in making a formal diagnosis.

• ASHA Criteria: The deficit must not be due to higher-order language, cognitive, or other factors. Diagnosis requires performance deficits meeting one of the following:
  • Greater than 2 standard deviations (>2 SDs) below the mean on two or more tests.
  • Greater than 3 standard deviations (>3 SDs) below the mean on one test.
  • Greater than 2 standard deviations (>2 SDs) below the mean on one test when accompanied by significant functional difficulty in auditory behaviors.
• AAA Criteria: A score greater than 2 standard deviations (>2 SDs) below the mean in one ear or greater on two different behavioral central auditory tests.

Screening Tests

Screening tests are quicker to administer than diagnostic tests but are generally less sensitive. They help identify individuals who may require a full diagnostic evaluation.

• Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) and Hearing in Noise Test Children (HINT-C): These tests assess sentence recognition in background noise using an adaptive (bracketing) technique to determine the subject's reception threshold for sentences in noise.
• SCAN-3:C and SCAN-3:A: These comprehensive screening tools evaluate various auditory processing modalities, including tonal gap detection, auditory figure ground, competing words tasks, filtered words, and time-compressed sentences.
• Jerger and Musiek (2000) recommended that a direct screening test procedure should include a dichotic digits task and a gap detection test.

Choosing Tests for Your Battery

When selecting tests for a comprehensive CAPD diagnostic battery, several factors must be considered to ensure the appropriateness and validity of the evaluation:

• Specific auditory processes assessed: Identify what particular auditory skills each test measures, aligning them with the reported deficits from the case history and observational tools.
• Nonauditory influences: Consider what other nonauditory factors might impact performance on the test, such as attention, cognitive load, or language abilities, and how to mitigate their influence.
• Age and cognitive appropriateness: Ensure that test materials and procedures are suitable for the individual's age and cognitive abilities.
• Normative data: Verify the availability and validity of normative data for the chosen tests to accurately compare the patient's performance to their peers.
• Comorbid conditions: Account for the potential effects of comorbid conditions on test results, as these can influence interpretation and diagnosis.

Four Test Types

A comprehensive CAPD evaluation typically involves a battery of tests categorized into four main types, each targeting different aspects of central auditory processing:

1. Binaural Interaction Tests: These tests evaluate the brain's ability to integrate acoustic information received by both ears efficiently. They assess central auditory processing by examining how the brain combines timing and intensity cues from each ear to localize sound and understand complex auditory scenes. These tests are particularly sensitive to brainstem pathology.

• Examples: Masking Level Difference (MLD) and Synthetic Sentence Identification (SSI). The MLD test, for instance, measures the ability to detect a tone in noise when phase or intensity cues differ between the ears. Binaural cues, such as interaural phase and intensity differences, are crucial for perceiving tones that might otherwise be masked by noise.

2. Dichotic Listening Tests: In these tests, different speech stimuli are presented simultaneously to each ear. The stimuli can be various speech units, such as CVCs (consonant-vowel-consonant), digits, monosyllabic words, or sentences. These tests may require either divided attention (repeating all stimuli heard in both ears) or directed attention (repeating stimuli from only one specified ear). Dichotic listening tests are highly sensitive to lesions of the auditory cortex and, importantly, interhemispheric pathways, particularly involving the corpus callosum. In cases of central auditory nervous system maturation delays, a "right ear advantage" may be observed, where stimuli presented to the right ear are processed more efficiently due to the direct contralateral projection to the language-dominant left hemisphere, while left ear input must cross the corpus callosum.

• Examples: Dichotic Digits, Dichotic Word Listening Test (DWLT), Competing Sentences, and Staggered Spondaic Word Test.

3. Monaural Low Redundancy Tests: These tests "stress test" the CANS by presenting degraded speech stimuli to one ear at a time. The degradation involves changes to the frequency, timing, or intensity of the original signal, reducing its "redundancy" and forcing the brain to work harder to decode the message. If the CANS is functioning well, the brain should be able to compensate for this degraded input. These tests are sensitive to cortical lesions, typically revealing contralateral deficits unless a left hemisphere lesion is extensive.

• Examples: Filtered Speech (e.g., low-pass filtered speech where high-frequency cues are removed), Time Compressed Sentences (rapid speech), and Speech in Noise tests.

4. Temporal Patterning and Processing Tests: These tests assess the brain's ability to perceive and interpret the timing aspects of sound, which is crucial for understanding prosody, speech rhythm, stress, and intonation. There are four subcomponents: temporal ordering, temporal discrimination, temporal integration, and temporal masking. Poor performance on these tests can indicate deficits in hemispheric processing (especially the right hemisphere for pattern recognition), corpus callosum functioning (for interhemispheric transfer), and temporal resolution (affecting speech clarity and rhythm perception).

• Examples: Gaps In Noise (GIN) test (detecting brief silent gaps in a white noise signal), Random Gap Detection Test, Duration Pattern Sequence, and Pitch Pattern Sequence/Frequency Pattern Sequence. For duration and pitch pattern tests, individuals are asked to identify a sequence of sounds based on their duration or pitch. If a verbal response is required (e.g., saying "long, long, short"), the test becomes sensitive to lesions in the left hemisphere; however, a hummed response can also be accepted to assess left hemisphere function without requiring verbalization.

A comprehensive table of these tests, including their applicability to adults and children, whether they can be performed with hearing loss (and necessary modifications), and their specific sensitivities, is an invaluable resource for clinicians. This structured approach to evaluation ensures that all relevant aspects of central auditory processing are thoroughly assessed, leading to a more accurate diagnosis and targeted intervention plan.

Intervention and Treatment

Once Central Auditory Processing Disorder has been diagnosed, intervention and treatment strategies are implemented to address the identified deficits and improve functional listening abilities. A multi-pronged approach typically involves auditory training, appropriate amplification and accessories, and the implementation of compensatory strategies and support. The effectiveness of these interventions is often enhanced when they are personalized to the individual's specific needs and auditory profile.

Auditory Training

Auditory training refers to structured, repetitive listening exercises designed to enhance specific auditory skills. These exercises aim to improve the brain's ability to process sound efficiently. Key areas targeted by auditory training include:

• Sound discrimination: The ability to differentiate between similar sounds.
• Auditory memory: The capacity to recall and retain auditory information.
• Temporal processing: The perception and interpretation of timing aspects of sound, such as order, duration, and spacing.
• Sound localization: The ability to identify the direction and origin of a sound.
• Auditory closure: The skill of filling in missing pieces of auditory information to comprehend a complete message.

Auditory training can be broadly categorized into two approaches:

• Bottom-up Training: This approach focuses on enhancing basic perceptual auditory skills. It is sensory-driven and aims to improve the fidelity of auditory input as it travels through the CANS. Examples include:
  • Phoneme discrimination tasks (distinguishing between individual speech sounds).
  • Temporal gap detection exercises (identifying brief pauses in sound).
  • Dichotic listening training (improving the processing of different sounds presented simultaneously to each ear).
• Top-down Training: This approach emphasizes cognitive-linguistic skills and focuses on the brain's higher-level processing abilities. It helps individuals use cognitive resources to compensate for auditory processing difficulties. Examples include:
  • Following multi-step oral directions.
  • Auditory memory games.
  • Speech in noise practice, which helps individuals develop strategies to focus on speech amidst distracting background noise.

Speech in noise difficulties are a very common and often debilitating symptom of CAPD. Treatment goals for these difficulties include strengthening auditory attention to speech while suppressing noise, improving the spatial separation of sound sources, enhancing temporal resolution (detecting speech cues in fluctuating noise), and building listening endurance to reduce auditory fatigue.

Training Programs and Techniques

Several structured training programs and techniques are available to address CAPD deficits:

• LiSN & Learn: This clinician-licensed software is designed for children and adolescents aged 6 years and older. It adaptively trains listeners in localization and attention to speech in spatially separated noise, aiming to improve spatial processing and real-world listening abilities. The program often incorporates engaging interfaces, such as the "Goal Game," to maintain user engagement.
• Listening and Communication Enhancement (LACE) and LACE AI Pro: LACE has long been a standard auditory training protocol. The newer LACE AI Pro, a phone-based application designed for teens and adults, trains users to understand degraded and rapid speech in noise. It also exercises working memory and utilizes visual and interactive modules. LACE AI Pro has been shown to improve speech in noise performance and listening confidence. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in such programs holds promise for further personalization and effectiveness in auditory therapy.
• Buffalo Model: Developed by the late Dr. Jack Katz, a seminal figure in audiology, the Buffalo Model is rooted in the anatomy of the central auditory nervous system and addresses deficits associated with specific structures. The Buffalo Model is a complex topic, and there are many other resources available online that explore this model in-depth. The Buffalo model uses three tests to diagnose CAPD and categorizes individuals into specific auditory profiles:
  • Decoding: Training improves the ability to quickly interpret sounds.
  • Tolerance-Fading Memory: Therapy enhances focus in noisy environments.
  • Integration: Therapy connects auditory information with other sensory input for improved comprehension.
  • Organization: Therapy helps with sequencing and structuring auditory information effectively.
• Additional Training Ideas: Beyond structured programs, other training ideas can be incorporated into daily routines. These include listening to audiobooks in low-level background noise to practice focused listening, and utilizing various app-based training programs such as SoundStorm, HearBuilder Auditory Memory, and Train Your Ears EQ Edition.

Compensatory Strategies and Support

In addition to direct auditory training and technological aids, compensatory strategies and environmental modifications play a crucial role in managing CAPD, particularly in academic and workplace settings. These strategies aim to reduce listening demands and provide alternative ways for individuals to access and process information.

• Classroom Accommodations:
  • Preferential seating: Positioning the student closer to the teacher and away from noise sources can significantly improve signal-to-noise ratio.
  • Visual aids and/or outlines of materials: Providing visual supports complements verbal instructions and reduces reliance on auditory processing alone.
  • Written instructions: Supplying written directions alongside verbal ones ensures that information is accessible through multiple modalities.
  • Built-in quiet time or listening breaks: Scheduled breaks can help reduce auditory fatigue and prevent cognitive overload.

Amplification and Accessories

Amplification and the use of Assistive Listening Devices (ALDs) are often recommended to improve auditory access and reduce listening fatigue, even in individuals with normal peripheral hearing. The goal is to enhance speech cues and improve the signal-to-noise ratio.

• Recommendations:
  • Binaural amplification with mild gain: Fitting hearing aids with mild gain can provide a subtle boost to speech signals without over-amplifying background noise.
  • Features that enhance speech cues: Programming hearing aids to prioritize and enhance the frequency range critical for speech understanding is essential, particularly the 1-4 kHz range. Additional use of directional microphones and noise reduction algorithms are also recommended, which both improve signal to noise ratio.
  • Remote microphone and/or FM systems: These systems are highly recommended, especially in challenging listening environments. They transmit the speaker's voice directly to the listener's ear, effectively reducing the distance between the speaker and listener and minimizing the impact of background noise.

Starkey's Edge AI devices exemplify how modern hearing technology can support individuals with CAPD. These devices incorporate an "always-on" Deep Neural Network (DNN) designed to mimic the brain's natural sound processing. Compared to previous generations, Edge AI devices are 30% more accurate at identifying speech in diffused background noise and offer an additional 6dB of low-level noise reduction, making them exceptionally quiet and less distracting.

• Edge Mode+: A key feature of Edge AI devices, Edge Mode+ is an on-demand DNN that provides more aggressive gain, directionality, and noise reduction than standard settings. This feature is particularly beneficial in challenging listening environments. It is tiered by technology level:
  • Edge AI 24: Once Edge Mode+ is engaged, this feature automatically adapts to changing environments without additional user direction.
  • Edge AI 20: Provides Edge Mode+ with patient-driven controls.
  • Edge AI 16: Includes Edge Mode+ without further adjustments.
  • The "Enhance Speech" option within Edge Mode+ is particularly effective for individuals with CAPD, as it helps to "zero in" on the speech signal.
• StarLink Edge Accessories:
  • StarLink Edge Table Microphone: This rechargeable device features eight built-in microphones and multiple listening modes (Automatic, Manual, Surround, Remote Mic). It automatically focuses on speech signals of interest in multi-speaker environments, providing clear and effortless listening. It has a battery charge time of 2 hours, a streaming time of up to 10 hours, and an operating range of up to 50 feet. It is ideal for group settings like boardrooms or staff meetings.
  • StarLink Edge Remote Microphone: A sleek, rechargeable remote microphone that enables effortless binaural streaming and enhances one-on-one conversations in noise. It also doubles as a convenient remote control. With a charge time of 3 hours and streaming time of up to 10 hours, and an operating range of 50 feet, it is an excellent tool for improving the signal-to-noise ratio in classroom settings, allowing a teacher's voice to be streamed directly to the student's hearing aids.

The overarching aim of these amplification and accessory recommendations is to improve the signal-to-noise ratio, making speech more preferential and accessible for individuals with CAPD, thereby reducing listening effort and enhancing overall communication.

Conclusion

Central Auditory Processing Disorder is a complex yet manageable condition that significantly impacts an individual's ability to interpret auditory information, even in the presence of normal peripheral hearing. As discussed, understanding CAPD necessitates a thorough grasp of its historical context, precise definitions from leading professional organizations, the intricate anatomy of the Central Auditory Nervous System, its prevalence across different age groups, and its diverse etiologies, including neurological and developmental factors. The significant comorbidity of CAPD with other neurodevelopmental and learning disorders underscores the importance of a comprehensive and nuanced diagnostic approach.

The evaluation process for CAPD is multifaceted, relying on a detailed case history, observational tools, adherence to established diagnostic criteria, and a battery of specialized tests. These tests, categorized into binaural interaction, dichotic listening, monaural low redundancy, and temporal patterning and processing, each provide unique insights into specific auditory processing deficits. The careful selection and interpretation of these tests are crucial for an accurate diagnosis.

Crucially, effective intervention and treatment for CAPD involve a holistic strategy. Auditory training, encompassing both bottom-up perceptual skills and top-down cognitive-linguistic abilities, plays a vital role in enhancing auditory processing. Programs like LiSN & Learn and LACE AI Pro offer structured and adaptive exercises to improve various aspects of listening. Complementary to training are compensatory strategies and environmental supports, such as preferential seating, visual aids, and quiet breaks, which minimize listening demands in daily life. Finally, appropriate amplification and advanced accessories, exemplified by technologies like Starkey's Edge AI devices with their Deep Neural Network and remote microphones, are instrumental in improving the signal-to-noise ratio and enhancing speech clarity, thereby reducing listening fatigue and optimizing communication for individuals with CAPD. By integrating these diverse approaches, clinicians can significantly improve the quality of life for those affected by central auditory processing disorder.

References

Agrawal, D., Dritsakis, G., Mahon, M., Mountjoy, A., & Bamiou, D. E. (2021). Experiences of patients with auditory processing disorder in getting support in health, education, and work settings: Findings from an online survey. Frontiers in Neurology, 12, 607907.

Alanazi, A. A. (2023). Understanding auditory processing disorder: A narrative review. Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences, 11(4), 275-282.

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (n.d.). Central auditory processing disorder [Practice portal]. https://www.asha.org/practice-portal/clinical-topics/central-auditory-processing-disorder/

Musiek, F. (2016). Introduction to temporal processing, its applications to CAPD, and other aspects of neuroaudiology. Audiology Online, Article 20238.

Musiek, F. E., & Chermak, G. D. (2015). Psychophysical and behavioral peripheral and central auditory tests. Handbook of Clinical Neurology, 129, 313-332.

O'Hara, Brian. (2024). APDQ USER MANUAL I FOR THE ONLINE APDQ QUESTIONNAIRE-2023 APDQ Overview. 10.13140/RG.2.2.15722.90569.

Ocklenburg, S., & Güntürkün, O. (2018). Language and the left hemisphere. The Lateralized Brain, 87, 121.

Pickles, J. O. (2015). Auditory pathways: Anatomy and physiology. Handbook of Clinical Neurology, 129, 3-25.

Sardone, R., Battista, P., Panza, F., Lozupone, M., Griseta, C., Castellana, F., ... & Quaranta, N. (2019). The age-related central auditory processing disorder: Silent impairment of the cognitive ear. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 13, 619.