AudiologyOnline Phone: 800-753-2160

Signia - Styletto AX - September 2022

Audiological Diagnosis: The Need To Establish Ourselves

Audiological Diagnosis: The Need To Establish Ourselves
Ross Roeser, PhD
August 22, 2000

In the January/February issue of Audiology Today my colleagues Drs. David Lipscomb and Michael Seidemann and I discussed the role of audiologists in the ''diagnosis'' of hearing impairment (Roeser, Lipscomb and Seidemann, 2000). The impetus for this article was twofold. First, each of us (Lipscomb and Seidemann significantly more than I) have had the experience during court testimony as expert witnesses in litigation involving hearing loss of being challenged by attorneys that we (as audiologists) are not qualified to provide testimony about hearing loss. In essence, the argument goes, audiologists are not qualified to render an opinion regarding hearing loss, especially with respect to causation and further, audiologists are not physicians and the medical condition of hearing loss requires the opinion of a medical doctor. It is not specified that the physician be an otologist or an otolaryngologist per se; the only requirement is that the expert be a physician.

The ritual during court proceedings involves the opposing attorney objecting to testimony by the audiologist during the qualifying period. Following sidebar discussions, the judge typically renders his/her opinion. For the cases in which I have testified it has always been in favor of having me accepted as an expert, but with the objection of the opposing attorney.

The second impetus for preparing the statement in the Audioogy Today viewpoint article was that with my colleagues Drs. Holly Hosford-Dunn, Michael Valente and I had just finished a series of three multiple contributor audiology textbooks, one of which was on diagnostic audiology (Roeser, Hosford-Dunn and Valente, 2000). This diagnostic textbook consists of 26 chapters and covers the entire gamut of topics relating to diagnostic audiology. Included are chapters on: the anatomy and physiology of the peripheral and central auditory systems, vestibular system diagnosis and disorders; radiology; brain imaging; pharmacology; psychoacoustics; calibration; pure tone and speech tests; central tests; ENG evoked potentials; neonatal screening; the genetics of hearing loss; and more.

Although the complex nature of diagnostic audiology is a well-known fact to me, having had first-hand exposure to the array of diagnostic material in the textbook which was just published under our editorship made me realize the sophisticated level that audiology has reached. It is now necessary for audiologists to have comprehensive knowledge and in-depth experience to administer and interpret diagnostic audiological tests. Audiologists, through their formal training and clinical experience, have this requisite knowledge and experience. Moreover, it is the audiologist who is on the front-line administering audiologic procedures, interpreting test results, counseling patients and referring and/or applying audiologic therapies for the vast majority of the time. Yet, it is apparent that audiologists are challenged by outside entities when it comes to diagnosing hearing loss/impairment.

Audiologists spend several years obtaining formal education and clinical experience being exposed to hearing science, acoustics, anatomy and physiology of hearing, hearing disorders, diagnostic audiology, counseling patients, rehabilitative audiological procedures including hearing aids, assistive listening devices, alternative communication models and many other devices and related topics. No other professional has the extensive background in hearing and hearing disorders.

In fact, in most medical schools, audiologists are responsible for providing the didactic and clinical material to the otolaryngology residents. The typical otolaryngology resident receives several formal lectures on interpretation of audiological test results and additional material is presented on basic hearing science and acoustics. Much of the clinical audiological training obtained by the otolaryngology resident is obtained through patient interaction alongside an audiologist-mentor.

This is not to say that audiologists are capable of rendering medical opinions; they are not. Medical opinions are beyond the scope of audiological practice. As an example, on the basis of determination of a conductive component an audiologist cannot inform a patient that surgery is needed and that hearing will be restored to normal limits. However, it may be stated that surgery may be indicated and, if it is successful, will improve hearing to normal levels.

The point of this brief commentary is to reinforce the principle that audiologists do have the necessary training and experience to diagnose hearing loss; audiologists can provide an audiological diagnosis. The basic distinction between conductive, sensorineural (and the distinction between sensory and neural) and mixed hearing loss is well within the scope of audiological practice. The distinction between cochlear, VIIIth nerve and central findings are certainly within the scope of audiological practice. Additionally, relating audiological findings to possible causation is certainly within the scope of audiological practice. Audiologists should have the confidence to defend their ability to provide diagnostic information and an audiological diagnosis.

Roeser, R. J., Hosford-Dunn, H. and Valente, M. (Eds) (2000) Audiology: Diagnosis. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., New York: NY.

Roeser, R. J., Lipscomb, D. and Seidemann, M. (2000) Viewpoint: Audiologists & Diagnosis. Audiology Today, 12 (1), 13-14.

Grand Rounds Series | New recorded webinars available!

Ross Roeser, PhD

University of Texas at Dallas/Callier Center for Communication Disorders

Related Courses

Cognitive Screening in the Audiology Practice: The Clinical and Business Opportunities
Presented by Heidi Hill, AuD, Jill Davis, AuD
Recorded Webinar
Course: #35845Level: Introductory1 Hour
The level of evidence connecting brain health and hearing health continues to expand, as does the use of hearing intervention as a mitigation strategy for cognitive decline. The need and demand for an appropriate, modern cognitive testing tool for use in audiology practice is clear. Dig into the science of the ear-brain connection, how cognitive screening fits in audiology practice, and why cognitive screening facilitates patient-centered care.

Cognition and Audition: Supporting Evidence, Screening Options, and Clinical Research
Presented by Regina Presley, AuD, FAAA, CCC-A
Recorded Webinar
Course: #37381Level: Introductory1 Hour
The evidence supporting the connection between cognitive health and hearing performance continues to expand, further supporting the need for a cognitive screening tool as part of an audiology clinical practice. This course will provide guidance on cognitive screening options, the benefits and challenges of each, evidence to support the use of each tool, and current clinical research that is underway exploring new technologies, implementation, and clinical outcomes.

Enhancing Audiologic Care Through Cognitive Screening
Presented by Jill Davis, AuD
Recorded Webinar
Course: #36624Level: Introductory1 Hour
The level of evidence connecting brain health and hearing health continues to expand, as does the use of hearing intervention as a mitigation strategy for cognitive decline. The need and demand for an appropriate, modern cognitive testing method for use in audiology practice is clear. This program will present Cognivue Thrive, a new cognitive screening tool that overcomes the common barriers that have limited the practical implementation of cognitive screening in audiology, and provide practical information on how to implement cognitive screening as part of expanded evaluation and outcome measures.

GSI Suite Options for Corti Data Management
Presented by Laura Prigge, AuD
Recorded Webinar
Course: #34329Level: Introductory0.5 Hours
GSI Suite offers comprehensive audiometric, tympanometric, and OAE data management. This webinar will focus on transferring, interpreting, and customizing reports for OAE data using the GSI Corti.

GSI Suite: Expand Your Data Options
Presented by Karen Morris, MS, CCC-A
Recorded Webinar
Course: #27931Level: Intermediate1 Hour
The purpose of this session is to present the new features of GSI Suite. The updated software features new displays of tympanometric data, enhanced options for report creation as well as new functionality within NOAH. This new functionality provides more options for customized reporting needs.

Our site uses cookies to improve your experience. By using our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy.