AudiologyOnline Phone: 800-753-2160


Phonak Audéo™ Paradise - August 2020

High-Power Hearing Aids and Children

High-Power Hearing Aids and Children
Ronda Condie, Jürgen Tchorz
March 3, 2004
Share:
This article is sponsored by Phonak.
Introduction:

Hearing impaired children need hearing aids that provide the most appropriate amplification to develop optimal communication skills. This is particularly true for children with sensorineural severe to profound hearing loss. Children in these categories typically have narrow "dynamic ranges." Reduced dynamic ranges can lead to compromised hearing aid fittings. Great care must be taken when fitting children with amplification. A variety of outcome measures should be employed to appreciate and manage the quality of the fittings.

The performance of a specific digital high power hearing aid in pediatric fittings was evaluated in a controlled field trial. Speech intelligibility in laboratory tests and self-reported benefit in daily life were assessed. Results were obtained and compared for field trial hearing aids and for the children's personal hearing aids. Personal and test hearing aids were set as closely as possible to the same prescriptive formula for each child.

Method and Design:

Ten children, ages 5 to 14 years (mean age: 10.7 years) participated in the study. All subjects were previously diagnosed with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, ranging from moderate to profound. The PTA across all children was 93.4 dB. Prior to this study, all subjects wore binaural behind-the-ear (BTE) hearing aids. Some had analog aids (N=2) but most had digital devices (N=8). Subjects were recruited from various public school settings within the state of Utah. Their personal hearing aids were previously fitted to various prescriptive targets by their personal audiologists. All subjects' personal hearing aids were functioning within manufacturer's specifications.

The experimental hearing aids were Phonak Supero 412 BTE models used with the subjects' personal earmolds. The Supero 412 is a fully digital hearing aid with a power processing method providing individual shaping across the frequency range for gain and maximum power output (MPO). The flexibility to shape the MPO curve is a feature of the Supero 412 unique in today's market. The Supero 412 is designed specifically for people for whom it is vital to optimize their limited residual dynamic range. A more precise shaping of the MPO curve allows for more utilization of gain at conversational levels. Amplification can be set to linear, Super-Compression or WDRC, respectively, depending on the individual hearing loss, user preference and professional preference. These are multi-program instruments with access to the programs via a manual switch.

The experimental hearing aids were programmed with Program 1 set for quiet listening situations and Program 2 set for noisy listening situations.

Fitting method:

Personal and experimental instruments were set as closely as possible to each subjects' Desired Sensation Level (DSL) targets for gain and MPO. Real Ear to Coupler Differences (RECDs) were included in the pre-calculation. RECDs were measured with each subjects' personal earmolds, in each of their ears, using an Audioscan RM500.

After fitting the instruments, subjects were given a one month period of acclimatization, wearing each set of instruments full time. Upon conclusion of the acclimatization period, objective and subjective tests were conducted with the subjects' personal and experimental hearing instruments.

A range of objective and subjective tests were presented. Objective measures of speech understanding were obtained in quiet and in noise. Speech intelligibility in quiet for eight subjects was determined using the PBK 50 (List A) at 50 dB HL at zero degrees azimuth, yielding a percent correct score. For children unable to perform the PBK due to lack of auditory skills, the closed-set WIPI test (Word Intelligibility by Picture Identification) in quiet was administered. The WIPI test is a multiple-choice, closed-set test requiring the subject to point to one of six pictures for each response (Ross & Learman, 1971). To test speech understanding in noise, Pediatric Speech Intelligibility (PSI) recorded sentence materials were used in Format I (Jerger et al., 1980). Sentences were presented at zero degrees azimuth at 60 dB HL, while recorded multi-talker babble was also presented at zero degrees azimuth. The multi-talker babble was presented at varying presentation levels to adaptively determine the "sentence Speech Reception Threshold" (sSRT), indicating the Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) at which 50% of the sentences could be correctly repeated (Nilsson, Soli, & Sullivan, 1994).

To assess subjective differences, two inventories were administered. The Children's Home Inventory for Listening Difficulties (CHILD) questionnaire, developed by Anderson and Smaldino (2000), was used to measure real-world listening performance with the subjects' personal and experimental hearing aids. Fourteen of the fifteen questions were scored from zero to eight points, with more points indicating more successful listening.

The second inventory administered was the Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) developed by Dillon et al. (1997). In this inventory, the subject effectively writes the self-report questionnaire by nominating up to five ranked listening situations in which help with hearing is required and their results were evaluated over time.

Speech test results:

The PBK speech test in quiet showed an advantage for the experimental hearing aids for soft speech input, and comparable performance for higher input levels (Fig. 1). Two subjects were unable to perform the open set PBK test (due to a higher degree of hearing loss and lower degrees of auditory skill) and were administered the closed set WIPI test. One subject did very poorly with both sets of hearing aids. The other benefited from the experimental aids for soft speech input, but degraded in loud speech.

The speech in noise results are shown in Figure 2. Better results were produced with the experimental aids. On average, the improved for the sSRT was 1.3dB.
Self-reported improvement:

The subjective judgments confirmed the speech test results, indicating better performance with the experimental hearing aids.

The CHILD questionnaires were administered to all parents and 8 of the 10 children. Parents and children consistently reported improved hearing in every-day situations with the experimental aids, compared to their personal instruments (Fig. 3). Interestingly, on average, the children's ratings were more positive than the judgments of their parents. However, the ratings the children assigned, and the ratings the parents assigned corresponded well, in general.

For the COSI, eight out of the ten children indicated five individual situations each, which were important for them and where they needed strong support from their hearing aids. Typical situations included, "Understanding speech in a mall," "Watching TV," or "Using the phone."

In direct comparisons for each individual situation, the experimental hearing aids were always judged same or better than their own aids, but never worse (Fig. 4). This was confirmed by the absolute rating of hearing ability in the individual situations (Fig. 5).

Conclusion:

This study evaluated the Supero 412 hearing system, as used by children, with moderate to profound hearing losses. The Supero 412 demonstrated advantageous speech intelligibility test scores and demonstrated self-reported benefit when compared to the users' personal instruments. Subjective comments from children and parents confirmed test results. These findings are especially significant for children with severe to profound sensorineural losses, who have a reduced dynamic range.

References:

Anderson KL, Smaldino JJ (2000). CHILD: Children's Home Inventory for Listening Difficulties. www.edaud.org See also www.phonak.com.

Dillon H, James A, and Ginis J. (1997). Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and Its Relationship to Several Other Measures of Benefit and Satisfaction Provided by Hearing Aids. J Am Acad Audiol 8: 27-43

Jerger S, Lewis S, Hawkins J, and Jerger J (1980). Pediatric speech intelligibility test. I. Generation of test materials. International J Pediat Otorhinolaryngol 1980, 2:217-230

Nilsson M, Soli S, and Sullivan J (1994). Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 1085-1096

Ross, M. & Lerman, J. (1971). Word Intelligibility by Picture Identification. Pittsburgh: Stanwix House.

Figures:

Fig. 1: Speech intelligibility in quiet for three input levels


Fig. 2: Speech intelligibility in noise. Lower sSRTs indicate better performance in noise.


Fig. 3: Average ratings for CHILD questionnaire from children (top) and parents (bottom).


Fig. 4: COSI: Degree of change with experimental aids, compared to own aids. In total, 40 specific needs were given by the children.

NEW 4-part series presented in partnership with the National Acoustics Lab | October 5, 12, 19, + 26 | 5:00 pm EDT | Course Typ

Ronda Condie


Jürgen Tchorz



Related Courses

Using Roger in the Homes of Children with Hearing Loss
Presented by Carlos Benitez
Recorded Webinar
Course: #32011Level: Intermediate1 Hour
Although remote microphone systems are primarily recommended for use in school settings, recent studies have shown potential benefits related to their use in the home environment. Information from these studies will be presented.

The State of Education for Students with Hearing Loss During the Pandemic
Presented by Erin Schafer, Dana Ulakovic, AuD
Recorded Webinar
Course: #36636Level: Intermediate1 Hour
Audiologists and school personnel serving students with hearing loss continue to face challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic due to dramatic changes to students’ learning environments and formats. Join Dr. Erin Schafer, of University of North Texas, to review key findings and the resulting recommendations to promote learning, engagement and educational access for K-12 students with hearing loss.

Portfolio of Hearing Solutions: Highlighting Pediatrics
Presented by Shannon Motsett, MA, CCC-A
Recorded Webinar
Course: #30508Level: Intermediate1 Hour
An outcomes-focused discussion of strategies for fitting children of all ages with advanced digital hearing instruments and remote microphone technology. Different fitting approaches were studied based on the child's age along with appropriate family-centered counseling strategies.

A Deep Dive into Target for Pediatric Fitting
Presented by Stacy Michels, MA, FAAA
Recorded Webinar
Course: #29492Level: Introductory1 Hour
In order for children to listen, develop speech and language, and learn effectively, they require access to all sounds, the best signal-to-noise ratio possible, and devices that are easy to use and are safe for little ears. The latest pediatric portfolio from Phonak, built on the signature Venture chip, features a variety of new features including AutoSense Sky OS, Roger Ready, Roger and Directional, and SoundRecover 2 to meet those needs.

Roger Technology: Solutions that Support Learning for All Students
Presented by Lisa Dyre, AuD, FAAA
Recorded Webinar
Course: #29749Level: Introductory1 Hour
Children spend a majority of the school day relying on their auditory system. This beginner course will explore the issues that children face in noisy classroom environments; discuss solutions for better student outcomes; and offer Phonak Roger troubleshooting tips to ensure successful implementation of technology.