AudiologyOnline Phone: 800-753-2160


Oticon Medical Because Sound Matters -November 2021

Audiology in the New Millenium

Audiology in the New Millenium
David Luterman, EdD
September 13, 2000
Share:

Audiology's origins are firmly rooted within the ''medical model.'' Despite our origin as a rehabilitative profession, our diagnostic abilities and interests were quickly realized and used to supplement the practice of otolaryngology. Carhart is generally credited with being the first audiologist. Carhart too, worked in conjunction with the physicians (otologists) at Deshon Army Hospital, in 1945. The practice model developed at Deshon was essentially a diagnostic one. Aural Rehabilitation (AR) was essentially limited to issues related to hearing aid prescription and later was amended to include hearing aid fitting.

Nonetheless, a unique and comprehensive program (including diagnostic and rehabilitative aspects of audiology) was developed in the early days at Walter Reed Hospital in Washington D.C. The Walter Reed program has not been duplicated and their model does not proliferate.

The application of audiology-based principles to the pediatric arena occurred later. Pediatric models (in the early days) also followed the medical model. These early ''pediatric audiology'' programs were primarily based in diagnostic tests and hearing aid fittings. The audiologist also served as ''gatekeeper'' between the child, the parent/guardian and the physician. Our AR role was restricted, at that time, to periodic hearing tests and monitoring the hearing aid status and use cycles. We referred the families to educational facilities. Few audiologists working in pediatric audiology went beyond the above described parameters and very few described themselves as ''rehabilitationists.''

In a poignant article titled ''Back to the Future,'' Ross (1997) articulates the very well founded argument that as long as the profession of audiology remains hospital based and diagnostically oriented, we will maintain our secondary position as hand maiden to the medical profession.

Ross effectively argued that our independence, professional autonomy and indeed, out future, reside in rehabilitative audiology. In brief, he argued that our willingness and ability to take responsibility for the patient after the diagnosis and fitting of hearing aids, is our most significant contribution to the patient, and is the basis for our professional survival. I wholeheartedly agree.

It is within the rehabilitative realm where we can expand our scope of practice, unfettered by other professionals. In many respects, our rehabilitative roots, established at Walter Reed many years ago, provides the basis for our continued professional growth and stability. It is likely that the change from solely prescribing hearing aids, to fitting and dispensing hearing aids, once again provided the catalyst audiologists needed to initiate and take responsibility for the rehabilitative process.

In a similar manner, with the acceptance and promulgation of universal newborn screening, our profession again needs to examine and actively participate in the aftermath of the audiologically-based diagnosis of hearing loss.

After the diagnosis of hearing loss, most audiologists refer families to early intervention programs. Importantly, data we have compiled indicates most professionals working in early intervention are not confident working with deaf individuals.

I believe, this is a problem which falls within our Scope of Practice and within our rehabilitative management abilities. We can, and should, more significantly impact the transition from diagnosis to auditory rehabilitation and education.

Presently, there is a failure of the management component of universal newborn screenings. Only 15 percent of identified children are getting amplification prior to age three months. Additionally, only 15 percent of identified children are getting auditory rehabilitative therapy prior to age 6 months. Children who are receiving auditory rehabilitative therapy are generally receiving it from a professional inexperienced in working with deaf children (see Aerhart et. al, 1998).

Because we, as a profession, are so enthusiastic regarding newborn hearing screenings, and because we have the expertise, training and education to truly and positively impact the lives of our patients beyond diagnostics, it behooves us to take responsibility for the aftermath of diagnosis. Our profession and our patients will be the better for it.

REFERENCES:
Ross, M., A retrospective look at the future of aural rehabilitation. JARA, 30 1997, 11-28.

Aerhart, K., Yoshinaga-Itano, C., Thomson, V., Gabbard, S., & Brown, A. State of States: The status of universal newborn hearing screening, assessment and intervention systems in 16 states. American Journal of Audiology, 1998. 77(2), 101-114.

Oticon Own - October 2022

David Luterman, EdD



Related Courses

Auditory Wellness: What Clinicians Need to Know
Presented by Brian Taylor, AuD, Barbara Weinstein, PhD
Audio
Course: #36608Level: Intermediate0.5 Hours
As most hearing care professionals know, the functional capabilities of individuals with hearing loss are defined by more than the audiogram. Many of these functional capabilities fall under the rubric, auditory wellness. This podcast will be a discussion between Brian Taylor of Signia and his guest, Barbara Weinstein, professor of audiology at City University of New York. They will outline the concept of auditory wellness, how it can be measured clinically and how properly fitted hearing aids have the potential to improve auditory wellness.

Understanding Patient Empowerment Along the Hearing Health Journey
Presented by Brian Taylor, AuD, Sarah Gotowiec, PhD
Audio
Course: #37890Level: Intermediate0.5 Hours
Most clinicians recognize the importance of empowerment in the patient journey, but do they know what it really means for a patient to feel empowered? Find out in this engaging and informative podcast with WSA research scientist, Sarah Gotowiec, PhD, who reviews the five dimensions of patient empowerment and how clinicians can apply her research to empower patients more effectively throughout the patient journey. This recent open access article is the focus of her discussion: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14992027.2021.1915509

Signia Expert Series: What Did They Say? Potential Solutions for Helping Patients Hear the Television
Presented by Erin Picou, AuD, PhD, Haiping Huang, AuD
Recorded Webinar
Course: #37895Level: Intermediate1 Hour
Watching television or movies at home is a very common leisure activity for adults. Yet, people with hearing loss often struggle to hear the television. This presentation will discuss the importance of television or movie viewing and will offer some evidence-based solutions for improving the television viewing experience for adults with hearing loss.

Clinical Implementation of Non-Custom Amplification
Presented by Lori Zitelli, AuD
Recorded Webinar
Course: #29706Level: Intermediate1 Hour
This course will describe how non-custom amplification can be used in both inpatient and outpatient settings. Details about each of the clinic settings and data collected from these clinics will be shared, as well as tips for those who are interested in implementing similar strategies.

Understanding Rehabilitation Needs of Adults with Cochlear Implants
Presented by Aaron Moberly, MD
Recorded Webinar
Course: #34827Level: Intermediate1 Hour
This course will provide an overview of the unique rehabilitation needs of older adults who receive cochlear implants. We will review recent studies exploring how cognitive functions contribute to speech recognition and quality of life outcomes in adults with cochlear implants, demonstrating a need to expand our perspective of how we define and measure outcomes.

Our site uses cookies to improve your experience. By using our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy.