AudiologyOnline Phone: 800-753-2160

Oticon Medical - BAHS - January 2024

Change of SLP Scope of Practice

Change of SLP Scope of Practice
Cindy Simon
October 4, 2000

To Audiologists Across America:

Once again our profession is being challenged. Everyone wants a piece of our territory. As Dr. Noel Crosby said in her 1999 President's speech at the Florida annual meeting, ''I'm angry! We must own the hearing test'' I would add, ''and other special tests''.

With that as introduction, it has come to my attention that ASHA has a revised draft of the Scope of Practice in Speech-Language Pathology, prepared by the Ad Hoc Committee on Scope of Practice in Speech-Language Pathology. The document is available for peer review. This can be accessed in several ways, such as;, by email at, through Fax-on-Demand at 877-541-5035 (documents 7017 and 7018) and by the action center at 800 498-2071.

Once again, someone is trying to get a piece of our territory by adding audiology test procedures into their scope-of-practice. It bothers me even more when that someone happens to be the speech-language pathologists who represent some 90 percent of ASHA.

The specific area of concern cab be found on page 9, lines 150 - 161 (items 2, 3, and 4). I'll address the three items in order (below).

Item 2: ''Developing and establishing augmentative and alternative communication techniques and strategies including selecting, prescribing, and dispensing of systems and devices.''

The language used does not state what kinds of ''devices'' they are talking about. Does it mean alternative devices to hearing aids or devices specific to speech involvement and communication? If it means alternative devices for communication for hearing impaired people, with or without hearing aids, I must protest. The way this is written, FM systems and hearing aids could fall into this poorly defined category referred to as ''devices''. If these devices are not selected and adjusted by an audiologist, the potential for harm exists. I believe we need to add clear verbage which eliminates auditory devices (such as ALDs and hearing aids) from item 2.

Item 3: ''Providing services to individuals with hearing loss and their families (e.g., communication counseling, auditory training, speech reading, speech and language intervention secondary to sensory aid placement, manual inspection of amplification devices including verification of appropriate battery voltage.)''

The audiologist should be doing the communication counseling. The audiologist is the expert with respect to auditory communication and related resources, needs, strategies, etc. for the hearing impaired. I strongly suggest ASHA eliminate the phrase ''communication counseling'' from item 3.

This next item is where the main controversy lies. The document states:

Item 4: ''Screening hearing across the life span through the use of conventional age-appropriate pure-tone screening methods, as well as screening for auditory system dysfunction through the use of dedicated physiologic and acoustic screening technologies (e.g., ABR, OAE, aural acoustic immittance) for the purpose of initial detection and referral of individuals with possible hearing loss.

I say, ABSOLUTELY NOT! SLPs have no business performing ABRs and OAEs, nor should they be performing acoustic immitance. The acceptance or promotion of Item 4 is clearly not in the patient's best interest. This is not where their area of expertise lies. Allowing (and indeed encouraging) SLPs to take on these responsibilities, and indeed sanctioning their participation in audiology-specific diagnostic tests (even if they're called ''screening technologies here'') is foolhardy, irresponsible and insulting.

Do audiologists offer accent reduction therapy? Do we perform phonological screenings? Pragmatic screenings? Cognitive deficit testing? Language screenings for educational placement? Of course not. When I suspect the need for SLP screenings, I make the referral to the recognized expert in these areas, my SLP colleagues.

I do so because it is in the best interest of the patient, and because it helps support my colleagues in SLP. I believe a mutual respect and a mutually beneficial relationship is in order here, particularly because it is in the best interest of the patient.

I cannot believe I need to write a letter to ASHA which identifies and defends the areas of expertise and scope of practice of audiology. What will they think of next? We have enough problems between the two professions without fostering more dissent. I cannot believe ASHA would publish, or even consider this stance.

Therefore, I ask that every audiologist IMMEDIATELY contact ASHA and let them know your thoughts on this matter. We must protect the consumer from ill-prepared individuals conducting tests they are not trained to perform.

Thank you all in advance for participating. We have only until October 10th to comment on this matter. Please hurry.

Cindy Simon, Au.D.
President, FLAA

Signia Xperience - July 2024

Cindy Simon

Related Courses

Everyday Cybersecurity Best Practices for Audiology Clinicians
Presented by Josiah Dykstra, PhD
Recorded Webinar
Course: #34706Level: Intermediate1 Hour
This course will cover practical steps and cybersecurity best practices to help protect professionals and their patients’ protected health information. Participants will learn how to recognize malicious emails and websites, how to select strong passwords, how to protect smartphones, and how to secure sensitive data.

Sustaining the Well-Being of Healthcare Workers During Coronavirus
Presented by Kathleen Weissberg, OTD, OTR/L, CMDCP, CDP
Course: #35071Level: Intermediate3 Hours
The coronavirus (COVID-19) is presenting new and unique challenges. We are navigating unchartered waters with this virus, making it important to find new ways to work and interact while also taking care of our mental health and well-being. Many are teleworking full-time for the first time, isolated from co-workers, friends and family. Others are on the front lines caring for others. No matter what, our daily living routines are disrupted causing added anxiety, stress and strain—physically, mentally, and financially. Now more than ever, we all must take care of our mental health and well-being. The purpose of this session is to provide wellness considerations for work settings as we all navigate the uncharted territory and response to novel Coronavirus (COVID-19). In this webinar, the learner will be offered strategies, exercises, activities and considerations for addressing their own health and wellness including stress management, sleep behaviors, and social connectedness. Additionally, symptoms related to trauma are reviewed along with techniques supervisors can utilize for effective, empathic management.

Understanding Privilege, for Healthcare Professionals
Presented by Esther Clervaud, EdS
Recorded Webinar
Course: #36096Level: Intermediate1 Hour
Systems of privilege have created a wide division of inequality. This course will help hearing care professionals identify their privilege and determine how to make a difference in their places of employment.

Creating Leadership in Audiology Through a Mentoring Circle
Presented by Natalie Phillips, AuD
Recorded Webinar
Course: #37632Level: Introductory1 Hour
There are so many components to quality patient care that it is challenging to “master” them all. What if you could come together with other professionals who possess knowledge or experience that could help you or your practice? There are a number of veteran audiologists as well as rising professionals who have wisdom, qualifications, narratives, and unique journeys to share. The purpose of this talk is to rethink the traditional mentor/mentee vertical relationship and explore collaboration in the form of circle…where all professionals, regardless of age or experience, learn from each other.

Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) to Improve Patient-Clinician Communication and Enhance Treatment Efficacy
Presented by Carren Stika, PhD
Recorded Webinar
Course: #35841Level: Introductory1 Hour
Due to the recent increased focus on providing patient-centered healthcare, use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have become an essential component of assessing whether the services provided improved patients’ health and sense of well-being. This course will discuss the role of PROMs in healthcare and how using these measures in clinical practice can enhance treatment efficacy, improve patient-clinician communication, and assist clinicians in providing better person-centered care.

Our site uses cookies to improve your experience. By using our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy.