AudiologyOnline Audiology Online logo Phone: 800-753-2160
Otometrics Otoscan - March 2019

What is the Difference Between Hearing Aid Verification and Validation?

Peter Kossek, Angela Flores, AuD, CCC-A, FAAA

April 3, 2017

Share:

Question

What is hearing aid verification, and how is it different from validation? Why is verification an important part of the fitting process?

Answer

Figure

Peter Kossek: That is a great question! Ears are different so we cannot expect the hearing instruments (HIs) to perform in a predicable way in different ears. The purpose of verification in a hearing instrument fitting context is to collect objective information about the sound that the hearing instrument is producing in the ear canal of the individual client, instead of relying on estimations of the performance of the hearing instrument in an average person’s ear. Secondly, a fitting process without verification is mainly based on the dialogue between the professional and the client. This dialogue is an extremely important and necessary part of the process, but the information that the professional needs to effectively adjust the HI for the best benefit consistently requires more details and accuracy than we can expect from the typical hearing instrument user.

Figure

Angela Flores, AuD: Probe microphone measurement or PMM is a tool with which to conduct verification.  It allows us to measure or verify how well the hearing instruments are performing in the ear relative to target gain, output, etc.  There are several reasons to conduct verification—Peter has already mentioned one—we can’t always rely on our patients to provide accurate and detailed information.  We also know that verification (as well as validation) are part of best practices guidelines both from the American Academy of Audiology (AAA) and the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA).  We also know from studies such as MarketTrak that verification may help to improve patient satisfaction and minimize return visits for adjustments.  Verification also allows us the opportunity to demonstrate key hearing instrument features, such as noise reduction, to the patient.  Demonstrating features via the PMM equipment can help the patient understand those features and improve their satisfaction. It also tells us, the professional, that those features are working the way they say they should.

So, let’s look at verification versus validation.  Those terms are sometimes used interchangeably, but they should not be, as they are two different things, although both are important. Verification is an objective measure to determine if the hearing instruments meet a particular standard and are performing as expected.  If we are running probe microphone measures to see if we matched a prescriptive gain target, we are performing verification.  Think of it this way, last night I followed a recipe for a yummy Greek chicken that I had in a restaurant not that long ago.  Following the recipe means putting in just the right amount of salt, olive oil, garlic, etc. – that’s verification.  Tasting the chicken and thinking, “that tastes just like the restaurant’s version” is validation.  When fitting hearing instruments, we need to know not only the objective measurements but also that the hearing instruments are meeting the goals of the patient.  For example, if the patient’s main goal is to hear their granddaughter better, are the hearing instruments allowing that to happen?  Validation can be measured through numerous tools such as questionnaires like the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB; Cox & Alexander, 1995) or through scales such as the Client Oriented Scale of Improvement or the COSI (Dillon, James, & Ginis, 1997).  Obviously, good counseling and understanding the patient’s needs, limitations and expectations are also an integral part of what we do as professionals.

Both verification and validation are important steps in a successful fitting process.

Peter: We see verification as a natural and necessary link in the value chain. Hearing instrument manufacturers invested huge sums of money into development of advanced features to help the hearing impaired. And so at the end of the day, it’s really simple: Verification is a necessary step to ensure that the patient has maximized the full value of features of the hearing instrument and that the hearing instrument manufacturer’s technology is presented in the optimal context.

The AURICAL is a complete modular solution that is integrated in the OTOsuite hearing care platform by Otometrics. It is a fitting tool developed to help the audiologists help patients by maximizing the features of their hearing instrument. Specifically, the AURICAL FreeFit with a dedicated PMM module is the wireless and binaural probe system for the verification. It gives additional possibilities and freedom in the verification process because the patient is not limited by wired probes – ensuring a more comfortable fitting experience. You can read more about the AURICAL fitting solution at: audiologysystems.com/aurical.

Angela: Otometrics/Audiology Systems provides CEU courses to help audiologists and hearing care professionals stay up-to-date on the latest fitting techniques. In addition to assisting their patients in selecting the appropriate hearing instruments, audiologists and hearing care professionals are faced with choices and decisions about the protocols they use for assessments, fittings, and follow-up. Specifically, they must decide what test and tools to include, how (and when) to introduce them, and what findings to look for. For maximum impact, these selections must strike a balance between the potential patient outcomes and the time and ease of implementing them.

The FittingNOW! Series (0.7 CEUs) provides information on tools and techniques to facilitate these decisions. Gus Mueller is the featured speaker for the 2017 course.

The Hand-on AURICAL Training (0.7 CEUs) is designed to assist new users of the AURICAL fitting system in becoming more familiar with the system’s operation.  Lastly, you may also join our AudiologyOnline webinar Verification & Counseling of Digital Hearing Instruments with the AURICAL PMM System.  Further resources and information can be found at www.audiologysystems.com and on the Otometrics/Audiology Systems Expo on AudiologyOnline.

References

Cox, R., & Alexander, G. (1995).  The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit. Ear Hear, 16,176-186.

Dillon, H., James, A., & Ginis, J. (1997). Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. JAAA, 8, 27-43.

Kochkin, S., Beck, D.L., Christensen, L.A., et al. (2010). MarkeTrak VIII: the impact of the hearing healthcare professionon hearing aid user success. Hear Rev, 17,12-34.


peter kossek

Peter Kossek

Product Manager, GN Otometrics

Peter Kossek has close to 30 years of experience in the hearing care industry. He has been involved in designing and developing several generations of fitting systems, introducing some firsts. Furthermore, Kossek is involved in cross-manufacturer work with other HIMSA licensees. He is the Senior Product Manager for the AURICAL fitting solution by Otometrics; a complete, modular fitting solution from Otometrics that encompasses audiometry, PMM, HIT, video otoscopy and an HI programming interface in one system. 


angela flores

Angela Flores, AuD, CCC-A, FAAA

Independent Audiology Consultant

Angela Flores, AuD, is an independent consultant for Audiology Services at GN Otometrics. Prior to serving as a consultant to Otometrics, Angela worked clinically with Mayo Clinic and the University of Florida Pediatric Program for over 8 years. More recently, she has worked with Siemens Hearing Instruments in varying roles including director of education and training, senior manager of education and training, and educational specialist positions. During her tenure at Siemens Hearing Instruments, Angela was responsible for the planning and implementation of customer and employee product educational sessions. Her responsibilities also included creating and editing sales and marketing pieces. She has lectured all over the United States, as well as, internationally on varying topics in the hearing healthcare industry.  Angela Flores received her master’s degree in audiology from the University of South Alabama and completed her Clinical Fellow Year at Mayo Clinic. She received her doctor of audiology degree from Salus University in 2009.


Related Courses

Verification & Counseling of Digital Hearing Instruments with the AURICAL PMM System
Presented by Angela Flores, AuD, CCC-A, FAAA
Recorded Webinar
Otometrics North America, a division of Natus (formerly Audiology Systems)

Presenter

Angela Flores, AuD, CCC-A, FAAA
Course: #24674 1 Hour
  'Well organized; follow the objectives mentioned upfront'   Read Reviews
This course provides an overview of hearing instrument verification procedures with the AURICAL probe microphone equipment. It will discuss benefits of verification, goals, basic terminology as well as provide a step-by-step tutorial of how to make measurements.

View this Course for FREE.
Need CEUs? Become a AudiologyOnline member to get unlimited CEUs.

Only $99/yr

Learn More

Audiometry For a New Era - The Madsen Astera2
Presented by Angela Flores, AuD, CCC-A, FAAA, Kathleen Hill, AuD, FAAA
Recorded Webinar
Otometrics North America, a division of Natus (formerly Audiology Systems)

Presenters

Angela Flores, AuD, CCC-A, FAAAKathleen Hill, AuD, FAAA
Course: #24903 1 Hour
  'I use an Aurical audiometer, so this was very informative'   Read Reviews
This one hour webinar will discuss the benefits of a PC-based audiometer as well as provide an in detail tutorial of how to test with the MADSEN Astera2. Information will also be provided on special testing features such as the Tinnitus Module, LipRead, and more.

View this Course for FREE.
Need CEUs? Become a AudiologyOnline member to get unlimited CEUs.

Only $99/yr

Learn More

OTOsuite - Computer Integration for the Modern Clinic
Presented by Angela Flores, AuD, CCC-A, FAAA, Kathleen Hill, AuD, FAAA
Recorded Webinar
Otometrics North America, a division of Natus (formerly Audiology Systems)

Presenters

Angela Flores, AuD, CCC-A, FAAAKathleen Hill, AuD, FAAA
Course: #25319 1 Hour
  'I liked how certain procedures were repeated to ensure understanding'   Read Reviews
This introductory course will familiarize participants with OTOsuite software, a platform utilized for integrating patient testing and counselling as well as providing reporting and documentation abilities. The benefits of utilizing a computerized platform will be discussed and a tutorial on how to navigate the software will be provided.

View this Course for FREE.
Need CEUs? Become a AudiologyOnline member to get unlimited CEUs.

Only $99/yr

Learn More

Evaluating Audio Visual Speech Perception in Adults and Children
Presented by Karen Kirk, PhD, Kathleen Hill, AuD, FAAA
Recorded Webinar
Otometrics North America, a division of Natus (formerly Audiology Systems)

Presenters

Karen Kirk, PhDKathleen Hill, AuD, FAAA
Course: #24532 1 Hour
  'It confirms my belief, initiated in graduate school, that speech recognition testing should be conducted with visual cues'   Read Reviews
Under natural conditions, listeners use both auditory and visual speech cues to extract meaning from speech signals produced by different talkers. However, traditional clinical tests of spoken word recognition routinely employ isolated words or sentences produced by a single talker in an auditory-only presentation format. We have developed new theoretically-motivated tests of audiovisual sentence recognition. Both the Multimodal Lexical Sentence Test for Adults™ (MLST-A™) The Multimodal Lexical Sentence Test for Children™ (MLST-C™) contain sentences with key words that are independently controlled for the lexical characteristics of word frequency (i.e., how often a word occurs in the language) and lexical density (i.e., the number of phonemically similar words, or neighbors, to the target word). To incorporate the kind of variability that listeners encounter in the real world, the sentences were drawn from stimuli produced by five male and five female talkers. The tests can be administered in a visual-only (V), auditory-only (A) or auditory-plus-visual (AV) presentation format. This presentation will describe test development and the psychometric properties of the tests including list equivalency, test-retest reliability and validity. Performance data will be presented for three different groups of adult and child participants: persons with normal hearing, persons with hearing loss who use cochlear implants, and persons with hearing loss who use a hearing aid. The clinical availability of this testing using the Madsen Astera2 by GN Otometrics will be discussed.

View this Course for FREE.
Need CEUs? Become a AudiologyOnline member to get unlimited CEUs.

Only $99/yr

Learn More

Evoked Potentials Part 3: Auditory Steady State Response
Presented by Wendy Crumley, MS, CCC-A
Recorded Webinar
Otometrics North America, a division of Natus (formerly Audiology Systems)

Presenter

Wendy Crumley, MS, CCC-A
Course: #878 1 Hour
  'Instruction was easy to follow!'   Read Reviews
No CEUs/Hours Offered
This presentation presents tips and recommendations for collecting quality ASSR responses. It includes understanding ASSR, uncovering the myths about ASSR, patient preparation, data collection as well as understanding the ICS RapidASSR algorithm and determining the threshold response.

View this Course for FREE.
Need CEUs? Become a AudiologyOnline member to get unlimited CEUs.

Only $99/yr

Learn More